Skip to content

UHF multi detector: implement fast poll of multiple UHFs#721

Open
ysalatheZI wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
yvess/uhf_multi_detector_fast_poll
Open

UHF multi detector: implement fast poll of multiple UHFs#721
ysalatheZI wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
yvess/uhf_multi_detector_fast_poll

Conversation

@ysalatheZI
Copy link
Contributor

Please use the following template for a pull request.

Loop over detectors in the inner-most poll loop in the UHF multi detector.

@leodicarlo , @mariosk-zi

In order for the pull request to be merged, the following conditions must be met:

  • test suite (Github actions) passes
  • all reasonable issues raised by codacy must be resolved
  • a positive review is required

Whenever possible the pull request should

  • follow the PEP8 style guide
  • have tests for the code
  • be well documented and contain comments

Tests are not mandatory as this is generally hard to make for instruments that interact with hardware.

@ysalatheZI ysalatheZI force-pushed the yvess/uhf_multi_detector_fast_poll branch 2 times, most recently from fc6c69a to 1806359 Compare January 25, 2023 13:37
@ysalatheZI ysalatheZI changed the title UHF multi detector: implement fast poll of multiple UHFs Draft: UHF multi detector: implement fast poll of multiple UHFs Jan 25, 2023
@ysalatheZI ysalatheZI force-pushed the yvess/uhf_multi_detector_fast_poll branch from 9cec522 to efd1b63 Compare January 25, 2023 20:41
@ysalatheZI ysalatheZI changed the title Draft: UHF multi detector: implement fast poll of multiple UHFs UHF multi detector: implement fast poll of multiple UHFs Jan 30, 2023
@ysalatheZI
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is ready for review.

@MiniSean
Copy link
Member

@RuggeroDiCarlo and @leodicarlo, what is the status of these changes?
Have they already been tested on the Inspire setup?

@MiniSean
Copy link
Member

After talking with @RuggeroDiCarlo I understand that there are two (identical) instances of this code.
One existing in this PR, and one already existing on the Inspire setup (not yet pushed to the inspire_detached branch).
After doing a branch comparison (for the relevant file UHFQC.py) both are indeed identical and working as intended.

Naturally I rather not push changes this way since it is very sensitive to errors and merge conflicts.
But we can make an exception for this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants